AI RELIANCE AND PROFESSIONAL JUDGMENT QUALITY  AMONG GOVERNMENT AUDITORS IN ACEH: THE MODERATING ROLE OF PROFESSIONAL SKEPTICISM

Luthfiar Ramiady; Hendri Bin Muhammad Nur

doi:10.65788/simban.v3i2.146

Authors

Luthfiar Ramiady Universitas Muhammadiyah Aceh
Hendri Bin Muhammad Nur Gabungan Riset Edukasi dan Eksplorasi Teori

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.65788/simban.v3i2.146

Keywords:

AI reliance, professional skepticism, professional judgment quality, government auditors, automation bias

Abstract

The adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) in government audit processes, ranging from data analytics to algorithm-based anomaly detection, promises significant efficiency gains, yet raises global concerns regarding automation bias, the tendency of auditors to accept AI output without adequate critical evaluation. This study aims to analyze the effect of AI reliance on the professional judgment quality of government auditors in Aceh, and to test and explore the moderating role of professional skepticism in this relationship. This study employs an explanatory sequential mixed methods design, beginning with a quantitative phase through a survey of 110 government auditors from the Aceh Inspectorate, Regency/City Inspectorates, the Aceh Representative Office of BPKP, and the Aceh Representative Office of BPK RI, analyzed using Moderated Regression Analysis (MRA), followed by a qualitative phase through in-depth interviews with ten selected auditors. The (illustrative) quantitative results reveal a counter-intuitive finding: AI reliance has a significant negative direct effect on professional judgment quality, yet professional skepticism significantly moderates this relationship by buffering (weakening) the negative effect. The qualitative phase reveals the underlying mechanism: auditors with high trait skepticism treat AI as a complementary tool that is still cross-verified, whereas auditors with low skepticism tend to treat AI as a substitutive tool whose output is accepted uncritically, a pattern informants themselves described as 'thinking laziness resulting from excessive trust in machines.' This study offers novelty as one of the first studies to empirically examine the specific construct of AI reliance, rather than general audit technology use, within the context of public-sector auditors in a special-autonomy region such as Aceh, while extending automation bias theory by positioning professional skepticism as a cognitive buffering mechanism. The practical implications underscore the urgency of strengthening professional skepticism training integrated with AI literacy for government auditors, so that the digital transformation of auditing does not come at the expense of professional judgment quality, which remains the core of the audit profession itself.

References

Chaker, I. (2024). Man & machine: Artificial intelligence's role in shaping auditor's professional scepticism. Journal of Modern Accounting and Auditing, 20(4). https://doi.org/10.17265/1548-6583/2024.04.002

Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340.

Deliu, D. (2024). Professional judgment and skepticism amidst the interaction of artificial intelligence and human intelligence. Audit Financiar, 22(4).

Ghozali, I. (2018). Aplikasi analisis multivariate dengan program IBM SPSS 25 (Edisi 9). Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.

Hurtt, R. K. (2010). Development of a scale to measure professional skepticism. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 29(1), 149–171.

Lastri, S., Yunina, F., & Putra Utama, M. S. (2022). Pengaruh skeptisisme profesional dan keahlian audit terhadap kualitas hasil audit (Studi pada Inspektorat Aceh). Akuntansi dan Teknologi Informasi, 15(2), 137–150. https://doi.org/10.24123/jati.v15i2.4915

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Muzahid, M., Maulizar, & Wijaya, I. (2018). Pengaruh kompetensi, independensi, dan skeptisisme profesional auditor terhadap kualitas audit pada auditor pemerintah di Kabupaten Aceh Utara. Proceeding Seminar Nasional Politeknik Negeri Lhokseumawe, 2(1), 93–96.

Ningsih, F., & Nadirsyah. (2017). Pengaruh independensi, skeptisisme profesional auditor, penerapan standar audit, dan etika audit terhadap kualitas hasil audit (Studi pada auditor BPK RI Perwakilan Provinsi Aceh). Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Ekonomi Akuntansi, 2(3), 48–58.

Panggabean, K. A. (2022). Pengaruh independensi auditor, skeptisisme profesional, dan objektivitas auditor terhadap kualitas audit. Journal Management, Business, and Accounting, 21(1), 60–73.

Parasuraman, R., & Manzey, D. H. (2010). Complacency and bias in human use of automation: An attributional model. Human Factors, 52(3), 381–410.

Peraturan Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan Republik Indonesia Nomor 1 Tahun 2017 tentang Standar Pemeriksaan Keuangan Negara (SPKN). (2017).

Rahayu, R. A. (2020). Pengaruh skeptisisme profesional audit dan keahlian auditor terhadap kualitas audit. Jurnal Riset Akuntansi Terpadu, 13(2), 242–255.

Skitka, L. J., Mosier, K. L., & Burdick, M. (1999). Does automation bias decision-making? International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 51(5), 991–1006.

Sugiyono. (2019). Metode penelitian kombinasi (mixed methods). Alfabeta.

Susilawati, & Salsabilla, A. (2023). Skeptisisme profesional, pengalaman auditor dan kualitas audit. Portofolio: Jurnal Ekonomi, Bisnis, Manajemen dan Akuntansi, 20(1), 42–53.